Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

THOMAS HILL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CINDI S. CURTIN, WARDEN, Respondent-Appellee.

ORDER
BEFORE: BATCHELDER, Chief Judge; BOGGS, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, GIBBONS, ROGERS, SUTTON, COOK McKEAGUE, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:

"The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal."


Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

This case will be argued before the en banc court on Wednesday, December 3, 2014. A briefing schedule will follow.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

__________


Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Hill v. Curtin
(May 13, 2014)