AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

LEARNING TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF THE INCARNATE WORD, Defendant.

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge

JUDGMENT

This action was tried by a jury, the undersigned judge presiding. On March 1, 2016, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of defendant on plaintiff's claims, and in favor of plaintiff on defendant's counterclaims. Consequently,

it is Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed

that judgment be entered in favor of defendant University of the Incarnate Word and against plaintiff Learning Technology Partners on plaintiff's claims, and that judgment be entered in favor of plaintiff (and counter-defendant) Learning Technology Partners and against defendant (and counter-claimant) University of the Incarnate Word on defendant's counterclaims, and that the action be dismissed, and further that each side shall bear its own costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 1, 2016

/s/_________


PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON


United States District Judge

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Partners v. Univ. of the Incarnate Word
(Mar 1, 2016)