AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

SPECIALISTS ENTERTAINMENT, INC., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Alecia MOORE, pre

Dechert LLP, New York (Benjamin E. Rosenberg of counsel), for appellants. Motta & Krents, New York (Anthony Motta of counsel), for respondent. Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C., New York (Thomas Kjellberg of counsel), for amicus curiae.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saliann Scarpulla, J.), entered on or about September 20, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiff's cross motion to amend its complaint to add a claim for breach of contract as a third-party beneficiary as against defendant Sony Music Holdings, Inc., unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the cross motion denied, and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Plaintiff cannot assert a claim as a third-party beneficiary of a letter agreement between defendants Moore and Sony. The agreement, requesting and authorizing Sony to deduct a portion of royalties payable to Moore and to pay them directly to plaintiff, by its express terms, negates any intent to permit enforcement by third-parties ( see Mendel v. Henry Phipps Plaza W., Inc., 6 N.Y.3d 783, 786, 811 N.Y.S.2d 294, 844 N.E.2d 748 [2000];Board of Mgrs. of Alexandria Condominium v. Broadway/72nd Assoc., 285 A.D.2d 422, 424, 729 N.Y.S.2d 16 [1st Dept.2001] ).

TOM, J.P., FRIEDMAN, ACOSTA, ANDRIAS, RICHTER, JJ., concur.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Specialists Entm't, Inc. v. Moore
(Mar 4, 2014)