Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Reza SANAT, Appellant.

McCARTHY

Louis N. Altman, Hurley, for appellant. D. Holley Carnright, District Attorney, Kingston (Joan Gudesblatt Lamb of counsel), for respondent.
Before: PETERS, P.J., LAHTINEN, McCARTHY and GARRY, JJ.

McCARTHY, J.


Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Williams, J.), rendered May 18, 2011, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the third degree.

In satisfaction of a multicount indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to burglary in the third degree and, thereafter, was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement. This appeal ensued.

As the record does not indicate that defendant moved to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction, his challenge to the voluntariness and factual sufficiency of his plea are not preserved for our review ( see People v. Morgan, 84 A.D.3d 1594, 1594, 922 N.Y.S.2d 666 [2011],lv. denied17 N.Y.3d 819, 929 N.Y.S.2d 808, 954 N.E.2d 99 [2011];People v. Smith, 57 A.D.3d 1237, 1237, 869 N.Y.S.2d 693 [2008] ). Furthermore, nothing in the record casts significant doubt on defendant's guilt or negates an essential element of the crime so as to warrant the application of the narrow exception to the preservation rule ( see People v. Thompson, 70 A.D.3d 1123, 1123, 894 N.Y.S.2d 577 [2010] ), and defendant “was not required to recite the elements of his crime or engage in a factual exposition, as his unequivocal affirmative responses to County Court's questions were sufficient to establish the elements of the crime charged” ( People v. Board, 75 A.D.3d 833, 834, 906 N.Y.S.2d 155 [2010] ).

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. PETERS, P.J., LAHTINEN and GARRY, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

People v. Sanat
(Jul 11, 2013)