AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

STEPHANIE PIAZZA, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH LAKKIS, Defendant.

A. Richard Caputo

(JUDGE CAPUTO)
ORDER

NOW, this 5th day of June, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Joseph Lakkis's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:

1. Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment Claims (contained within Counts I, II and III) are DISMISSED;
2. Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment Claim for Malicious Prosecution (Count III) is DISMISSED. However, Plaintiff is given twenty-one (21) days to file an amended complaint solely as to this claim. When submitting such an amended complaint, Plaintiff is directed to follow the procedure for highlighting of amendments outlined in Local Rule 15.1(b).
3. Plaintiff's claims for unlawful arrest under both the Fourth Amendment and under state law (Counts II and VII) are DISMISSED.



The Motion is DENIED in all other respects.

_______________


A. Richard Caputo


United States District Judge


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Piazza v. Lakkis
(Jun 5, 2012)