Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

CURT ALLEN SIGLER, Plaintiff, v. JANE OR JOHN DOE #1, an unidentified teller at an unknown branch of Chase Bank in Colorado, JANE OR JOHN DOE #2, an unidentified super

ORDER

LEWIS BABCOCK, Judge

This case is before me on the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge issued and served on September 22, 2011 (Docs 32, 33 and 35). Plaintiff has failed to file specific written objections to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation and is therefore barred from de novo review. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the recommendations are accepted as follows:

1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (Doc 14) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:
a. GRANTED to the extent it seeks dismissal of the Plaintiff's claim under the UCC as against the Doe defendants; and DENIED insofar as it seeks dismissal of the UCC claim as against JP Morgan Chase;
b. GRANTED insofar as it seeks dismissal of the Plaintiff's negligence claims; and
c. GRANTED to the extent it seeks dismissal of The Corporation Company.
2. Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(1)(A)(ii) (Doc 20) is DENIED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SIGLER v. DOE
(Oct 12, 2011)