Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Barbara Velasco, Appellant, v. Mary L. Beck, Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Zane T. Cagle, 500 N. Broadway, Suite 1605, St. Louis, MO 63102, for appellant.

Carl D. Kraft, 12901 North Forty Drive, St. Louis, MO 63141, for respondent.

Before Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J., and Lisa Van Auburg, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Barbara Velasco appeals the trial court's judgment granting a new trial after a jury awarded her $188,000 in damages from an auto accident caused by the respondent, Mary Beck. The court granted Beck's motion for a new trial because Velasco's counsel revealed Beck's insurance coverage to the jury in violation of the collateral source rule.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Velasco v. Beck
(Mar 3, 2015)