AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

FABIAN VILLARREAL, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. #13),
DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #9), GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #12), AND AFFIRMING THE FINDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER

On May 7, 2012, plaintiff filed a complaint for judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") denying plaintiff's application for benefits. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Michelson. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. On July 1, 2013, Magistrate Judge Michelson issued a report and recommendation on the cross-motions for summary judgment (Doc. #13). In her report, Magistrate Judge Michelson recommends plaintiff's motion for summary judgment should be denied, defendant's motion for summary judgment be granted, and the findings of the Commissioner affirmed.

In his motion for summary judgment, plaintiff took issue with the ALJ's questioning of the VE and the VE's testimony. As the magistrate judge noted, plaintiff's counsel did not cross-examine the VE at the administrative hearing. The ALJ's assessment of plaintiff's credibility concerning both his pain and his diabetes symptoms was necessarily a part of his questioning of the VE as well as his conclusions. The court agrees with Magistrate Judge Michelson that substantial evidence supported the determination that plaintiff is not disabled. Concerning the weight attributed to the reporting agency's medical examiner, the court again agrees with the magistrate judge that his opinion is largely consistent with the record, and that the ALJ's determination was supported by substantial evidence.

Magistrate Judge Michelson specifically stated that any objections to her report must be filed within 14 days of service, and that failure to file such objections constituted a waiver of any further right of appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985). Plaintiff did not file any objections.

This Court hereby adopts Magistrate Judge Michelson's well-reasoned July 1, 2013 report and recommendation (Doc. #13). Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED, and defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and the findings of the Commissioner are AFFIRMED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________________


GEORGE CARAM STEEH


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on
August 1, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. Marcia Beauchemin Deputy Clerk
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Villarreal v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
(Aug 1, 2013)