AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ART WILLIAMS, Defendant.

DAVID G. LARIMER

DECISION AND ORDER

The defendant, Art Williams ("Williams"), was sentenced in 2003 and, in addition to a sentence of imprisonment, was ordered to pay a fine and penalty assessment. In an effort to collect monies due, the Government discovered that a modest sum, $80.95, was being held as unclaimed funds by the State of New York. Therefore, the Government issued a Writ of Execution on the State of New York and, pursuant to the Writ, the monies were forwarded to the Clerk of Court to be applied toward the balance of the fine and penalty assessments. By motion (Dkt. #272), Williams moved to contest or quash the Writ. The Government duly responded (Dkt. #274).

Principally for the reasons set forth in the Government's Response, I deny defendant's motion to quash. It is clear that Williams remains indebted to the Government based on this Court's sentence, and funds held in his name may be seized to satisfy the debt. There is no legal or factual reason to preclude the Government's seizure of these funds.

CONCLUSION

Defendant Art Williams' motion to contest/quash the Writ of Execution (Dkt. #272) is in all respects denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________


DAVID G. LARIMER


United States District Judge
Dated: Rochester, New York


August 1, 2013.


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Williams
(Aug 1, 2013)