Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Karen LOMBARDI v. CITY OF PROVIDENCE et al.

Providence County Superior, Associate Justice Walter R. Stone.


Matthew I. Shaw, for appellant. Megan K. Maciasz, for appellee.


ORDER

This case came before the Supreme Court on March 6, 2013, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. After examining the record, it has become apparent that the appellant, the State of Rhode Island, has failed to file a cross-claim against the appellee, the City of Providence. The absence of a cross-claim raises a substantial question about the appellant's standing to appeal from the entry of final judgment in favor of the plaintiff's claim against the appellee. The filing of supplemental memoranda addressing this question is required.

Accordingly, the parties are directed to file supplemental memoranda not exceeding ten pages in length within fifteen days of the date of this order on the issue of whether the appellant is a “party aggrieved by” the final judgment under G.L. 1956 § 9–24–1 and this Court's decisions in Adams v. United Developers, Inc., 121 R.I. 177, 179–80, 397 A.2d 503, 505–06 (1979), and Markham v. Cross Transportation, Inc., 119 R.I. 213, 229, 376 A.2d 1359, 1367–68 (1977).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Lombardi v. City of Providence
(Apr 1, 2013)