AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID R. SCHOLFIELD, Defendant.

WILLIAM M. CONLEY

ORDER FOR RESTITUTION

On October 14, 2011, defendant was sentenced to a 60-month term of imprisonment in case number 11-CR-27. At the time of the sentencing hearing, restitution was unable to be determined. Subsequent information has been received which has allowed the parties to agree on the proper restitution amount.

As to count one of the information, it is ordered that the defendant pay restitution in the amount of $5,220,387.69 to the Clerk of Court for the Western District of Wisconsin to be disbursed as indicated in Appendix A. The restitution obligation is to be paid jointly and severally with Susan M. Brockman or any others convicted in connection with the fraudulent scheme.

Defendant does not have the economic resources to allow him to make full payment of restitution in the foreseeable future under any reasonable schedule of payments. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3664(f)(3)(B), he is to begin making nominal payments of a minimum of $250 each month, beginning within 30 days of defendant's release from custody.

Defendant shall notify the court and the Attorney General of any material change in defendant's economic circumstances that might affect defendant's ability to pay restitution.

No interest is to accrue on the unpaid portion of the restitution.

In all other respects, the judgment remains as entered on October 14, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

_____________________


WILLIAM M. CONLEY


District Judge


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Scholfield
(Jan 10, 2012)