Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JAMEL KING, Plaintiff, v. C.O. MCINTYRE, Correctional Officer; LT. MCDERMOTT, Correctional Lieutenant; C.O. STEVENS, Correctional Officer; SGT. YOUNG, Correctional Sergeant; C.O. KANE, Correctional Officer; C.O. HOESSLE, Correctional Officer; C.O. CATLIN, Correctional Officer; DEPT. C. MILLER, Deputy Superintendent of Security; COMM. BRIAN FISCHER, Commissioner of the Department of Corrections Community Super

DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge

APPEARANCES: JAMEL KING
01-A-4949
Plaintiff pro se
Elmira Correctional Facility
P.O. Box 500
Elmira, NY 14902
HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN
Attorney General for the State of New York
Attorney for Defendants
The Capitol
Albany, NY 12224
OF COUNSEL: MICHAEL G. MCCARTIN, ESQ.
Ass't Attorney General
DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER












Pro se plaintiff Jamel King brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 17, 2015, the Honorable Thérèse Wiley Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that defendants' motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 be granted in part and denied in part. No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed.

Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Therefore, it is

ORDERED that

1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part;

2. All claims are DISMISSED except the retaliation claims against defendants Catlin and McDermott arising from the March 28, 2011, misbehavior report and the April 6, 2011, disciplinary hearing on that report;

3. All claims against defendants Young and Kane are sua sponte DISMISSED; and

4. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this Decision and Order upon the parties in accordance with the Local Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________


United States District Judge
Dated: April 8, 2015


Utica, New York.


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

King v. McIntyre
(Apr 8, 2015)