AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Ethel McFARLAND, Appellant, v. Robert TRAME and Kilo Flynn Billingsley Trame & Brown, P.C., Respondent, and Bank of America NA, Defendant.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Gloria C. Reno, Judge.
David C. Knieriem, Clayton, MO, for appellant. Gerard T. Noce, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before LISA S. VAN AMBURG, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and PHILIP M. HESS, J.


ORDER


PER CURIAM.


Ethel McFarland (Plaintiff) appeals the trial court's grant of partial summary judgment, dismissal of Count IV, and entry of judgment upon a jury verdict in favor of Robert Trame on Plaintiff's claims of breach of fiduciary duty and Trame's counterclaim for unjust enrichment. Plaintiff claims the trial court erred in: (1) granting Defendants Trame and Kilo, Flynn, Billingsley, Trame & Brown, P.C. (collectively “Defendants”) summary judgment on Plaintiff's claims of fraud and “imputed fraud”; (2) dismissing Plaintiff's claim that Defendants violated the Missouri Merchandising Practicing Act (MMPA); (3) denying Plaintiff's motion to sever Trame's counterclaim for a separate trial; (4) denying Plaintiff's motion for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict as to Trame's counterclaim; (5) refusing to admit statutory language into evidence; (6) limiting a witness's testimony; and (7) submitting erroneous instructions to the jury.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error in any of the respects alleged. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

McFarland v. Robert Trame & Kilo Flynn Billingsley Trame & Brown, P.C.
(Aug 19, 2014)