AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PAUL L. ROBERTS

JUDGE COLLIER

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

The defendant appeared for a hearing before the undersigned on April 2, 2012, in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on the Petition for Warrant for Offender Under Supervision of U.S. Probation Officer Sladjuana Hays and the Warrant for Arrest issued by U.S. District Judge Curtis L. Collier. Those present for the hearing included:

(1) AUSA Terra Bay for the USA.
(2) The defendant PAUL L. ROBERTS.
(3) Attorney Mary Ellen Coleman for defendant.
(4) Deputy Clerk Kelli Jones.




After being sworn in due form of law the defendant was informed or reminded of his privilege against self-incrimination accorded him under the 5th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

It was determined the defendant wished to be represented by an attorney and he qualified for the appointment of an attorney to represent him at government expense. Federal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee, Inc. was appointed to represent the defendant. It was determined the defendant had been provided with a copy of the Petition for Warrant for Offender Under Supervision and the Warrant for Arrest and had the opportunity of reviewing those documents with his attorney. It was also determined the defendant was capable of being able to read and understand the copy of the aforesaid documents he had been provided.

AUSA Bay called USPO Sladjuana Hays as a witness and moved that the defendant be detained pending the revocation hearing.

Findings


(1) Based upon USPO Hays' testimony, the undersigned finds there is probable cause to believe defendant has committed violations of his conditions of supervised release as alleged or set forth in the Petition.

(2) The defendant has not carried his burden under Rule 32.1(a)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, that if released on bail he will not flee or will not pose a danger to the community.

Conclusions

It is ORDERED:

(1) The motion of AUSA Bay that the defendant be DETAINED WITHOUT BAIL pending the revocation hearing before U.S. District Judge Curtis L. Collier is GRANTED.

(2) The U.S. Marshal shall transport defendant to a revocation hearing before Judge Collier on Thursday, April 12, 2012, at 2:00 pm.

ENTER.

_________________________


UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Roberts
(Apr 2, 2012)