AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

WYETH HOLDINGS CORPORATION, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. SANDOZ, INC., Defendant.

ORDER

At Wilmington this ____ day of March, 2012.

WHEREAS, Magistrate Judge Burke issued a Report and Recommendation (D.I. 89) dated February 3, 2012;

WHEREAS, the Report and Recommendation recommends that the Court DENY Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss Sandoz's Fourth Counterclaim and to strike Sandoz's Fourth Affirmative Defense directed to inequitable conduct (D.I. 64).

WHEREAS, any Objections to the Report and Recommendation (D.I. 89) were to be filed by Februay 21, 2012;

WHEREAS, neither party has filed an Objection to the Report and Recommendation;

WHEREAS, the Court concludes that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted for the reasons stated by Magistrate Judge Burke;

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (D.I. 89) is ADOPTED: and Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss Sandoz's Fourth Counterclaim and to strike Sandoz's Fourth Affirmative Defense directed to inequitable conduct (D.I. 64) is DENIED.

______________________


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Wyeth Holdings Corp. v. Sandoz, Inc.
(Mar 1, 2012)