TERRY L. WOOTEN
ORDER
This action has been filed by the plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se. This matter is now before the undersigned for review of the Report and Recommendation ("the Report") filed by United States Magistrate Judge Thomas E. Rogers, III, to whom this case had previously been assigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 73.02(B)(2) (D.S.C.). In his Report, Magistrate Judge Rogers recommends that the Defendant National Legal Professional Associates' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 31) be granted, and that this case be dismissed in its entirety for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Report was filed on January 31, 2012. No objections to the Report have been filed.
This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that report. 28 U.S.C. § 636. No objections have been filed to the Report. In the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983).
A review of the record indicates that the Report accurately summarizes this case and the applicable law. For the reasons articulated by the Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report is ACCEPTED (Doc. # 50), the Defendant National Legal Professional Associates' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 31) is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED in its entirety for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
___________________________
TERRY L. WOOTEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
March 1, 2012
Florence, South Carolina