Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DEREK N. JARVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, Chief Judge, US District Court for the District of Maryland; CHARLES B. DAY, Magistrate Judge, US District Court for the District of Maryland; PETER J. MESSITTE, Judge, US District Court for the District of Maryland; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE; TRAXLER, Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; WILKINSON, Circuit Judge, US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; AGEE, Circuit Judge, US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Defendants - Appellees.

PER CURIAM

UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:11-cv-00627-AW)

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derek N. Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Derek N. Jarvis appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jarvis v. Chasanow, No. 8:11-cv-00627-AW (D. Md. Mar. 15, 2011); see Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325, 335 (1983) (noting that quasi-judicial immunity accorded to individuals who play integral part in judicial process); Johnson v. Turner, 125 F.3d 324, 332 (6th Cir. 1997) (finding clerk's office employees, acting as a judge's designee, are entitled to quasi-judicial immunity). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Jarvis v. Chasanow
(Oct 4, 2011)