Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

In re KRUPA, Minors.

Prior report: Mich.App., 2011 WL 5067253.

Order

On order of the Court, the motion to consider additional transcripts is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the October 25, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals misapplied the clear error standard by engaging in improper fact-finding and substituting its judgment for that of the trial court. MCR 3.977(K); MCR 2.613(C); In re Miller, 433 Mich. 331, 445 N.W.2d 161 (1989). As a result, the Court of Appeals rendered a decision that was contrary to the clear and convincing evidence supporting the statutory grounds for termination under MCL 712A.19b(3)(g) and (j). We REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for it to address the remaining issue raised by the respondent on direct appeal—whether the trial court erred in determining that termination of parental rights was in the children's best interests. MCL 712A.19b(5).

We do not retain jurisdiction.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

In re Krupa
(Feb 1, 2012)