Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

SYLVESTER NICHOLS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

Per curiam. Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.

ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS ANGELINA COUNTY

Per curiam . Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.

ORDER

The petition for discretionary review violates Rules of Appellate Procedure 68.5, because it exceeds the page limits.

The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.

The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days after the date of this order. Do Not Publish

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Nichols v. State
(Feb 1, 2012)