Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

STUART H. SMITH AND BARRY J. COOPER v. JOHN TSATSOULIS D/B/A MARKET CAFE

LOVE, J.

LOVE, J., DISSENTS AND ASSIGNS REASONS

I respectfully dissent from the majority's denial of the Motion to Dismiss Appeal. I would refer this matter to the appeal panel, as the entire record will be before the Court to review as opposed to the Motion to Dismiss and Opposition. See LA. CONST. art. V, § 10. See also Chenevert v. Hilton, 07-1223, p. 3 (La. App. 3 Cir. 3/5/08), 978 So. 2d 1078, 1082; Joseph v. Vanguard Ins. Co., 99-1475, p. 1 (La. App. 3 Cir. 3/1/00), 758 So. 2d 893, 894; United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Landry, 212 So. 2d 458, 458-59 (La. App. 1st Cir. 1968). Thus, the appeal panel will be in an optimal position to determine whether the present matter should be maintained as an appeal, as an application for supervisory review, or dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Smith v. Tsatsoulis
(Jan 1, 2015)