AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

MITCHELL D. RICH, Plaintiff, v. CAPTAIN BOOTH, et al., Defendants.

HENRY E. HUDSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Dismissing Action Without Prejudice)


By Memorandum Order entered on November 25, 2014, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiff's action. The Court directed Plaintiff to affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a consent to collection of fees form. The Court warned Plaintiff that a failure to comply with either of the above directives within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action.

Plaintiff has not complied with the order of this Court. Plaintiff failed to return the consent to collection of fees form. As a result, he does not qualify for in forma pauperis status. Furthermore, he has not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Such conduct demonstrates a willful failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, this action will be dismissed without prejudice.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. Date: Jan. 9, 2015
Richmond, Virginia


/s/_________


HENRY E. HUDSON


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Rich v. Booth
(Jan 9, 2015)