PER CURIAM
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:09-CV-2999
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is DENIED.
Petitioner has also moved that this court vacate its prior opinion and remand to the district court for consideration of his previously made claim of ineffective assistance of state habeas counsel in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Martinez v. Ryan, 132 S. Ct. 1309 (2012). This court recently addressed Martinez's applicability in Texas. See Ibarra v. Thaler, No. 11-70031, 2012 WL 2620520, at *4 (5th Cir. June 28, 2012). We held that, because Texas does not mandate ineffective assistance claims to be brought first in habeas proceedings, Martinez does not apply in Texas. Id. Accordingly, we DENY the motion.