Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

United States of America, v. Christopher Ryan Hayes, Defendant.

CAMERON MCGOWAN CURRIE SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

OPINION and ORDER

This matter is before the court on Defendant's motion for appointment of counsel. ECF No. 373. Defendant argues that he seeks the appointment of counsel to assist him in filing a "second 2255 [motion] based on new evidence." Mot. at 1.

Attorneys may be appointed for a person "seeking relief under section 2241, 2254, or 2255 of title 28" when "the court determines that the interests of justice so require." 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B). Before Defendant can file a "second 2255" in this court, he must seek permission from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals to do so. As provided in 28 U.S.C. § 2244, "[b]efore a second or successive application permitted by this section is filed in the district court, the applicant shall move in the appropriate court of appeals for an order authorizing the district court to consider the application." 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). See also Rule 9 of the Rules Governing 2255 Proceedings ("Before presenting a second or successive motion, the moving party must obtain an order from the appropriate court of appeals authorizing the district court to consider the motion . . . ."). It does not appear that Defendant has sought this permission. For this reason and because the interests of justice do not require an appointment, Defendant's motion is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Cameron McGowan Currie


CAMERON MCGOWAN CURRIE


SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Columbia, South Carolina
November 3, 2014




Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Hayes
(Nov 3, 2014)