Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

SHAFER ELECTRIC & CONSTRUCTION, Respondent v. Raymond MANTIA and Donna Mantia, Husband and Wife, Petitioners.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court, No. 276 WAL 2013.


ORDER


PER CURIAM.


AND NOW, this 29th day of October, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED.

The issues are:

(1) Whether the Home Improvement Consumer Protection Act, 73 Pa. Stat. §§ 517.1–517.18, bars a contractor from recovery under a theory of quantum meruit in the absence of a valid and enforceable home improvement contract under the Act[.]


(2) Whether the decisions of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania in Shafer Electric & Construction v. Mantia, (Pa.Super.Ct.2013), and Durst v. Milroy, 52 A.3d 357, 2012 PA Super 179 (Pa.Super.Ct.2012), conflict with the Home Improvement Consumer Protection Act, 73 Pa. Stat. §§ 517.7(a) and (g), and should be overturned by this Court[.]


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Shafer Elec. & Constr. v. Mantia
(Oct 29, 2013)