Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

MARK ANTHONY REID, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Petitioners v. CHRISTOPHER DONELAN, Sheriff, Franklin County, MA, et al., Respondents

MICHAEL A. PONSOR

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING JOINT MOTION FOR A SCHEDULING ORDER
(Dkt. No. 94)

PONSOR, U.S.D.J.

The parties' Joint Motion for a Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 94) is hereby ALLOWED. The court orders as follows:

1. Cross-motions for summary judgment in this case will be filed on or before May 1, 2014.
2. Opposition to the motions will be filed by May 30, 2014.
3. Counsel will appear for argument on the motions on June 4, 2014 at 2:00 p.m.



This schedule does not accommodate discovery as requested by Petitioner. The cross-motions may, of course, be supported by affidavits, and Petitioner is free to oppose Defendant's cross-motion by invoking Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d), identifying the discovery that Petitioner contends would generate a disputed issue of fact, and requesting a period of time to conduct this discovery. At the moment, however, the need for discovery does not appear compelling.

It is So Ordered.

__________________________


MICHAEL A. PONSOR


U. S. District Judge


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Reid v. Donelan
(Mar 3, 2014)