Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ernest G. POZZI, Appellant.

McCARTHY


Pamela A. Fairbanks, Ithaca, for appellant. Joseph G. Fazzary, District Attorney, Watkins Glen (Matthew C. Hayden of counsel), for respondent.
Before: STEIN, J.P., McCARTHY, ROSE and EGAN JR., JJ.

McCARTHY, J.



Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schuyler County (Argetsinger, J.), rendered July 15, 2010, which revoked defendant's probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

In 2009, defendant pleaded guilty to aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree and driving while intoxicated. County Court sentenced defendant to six months in jail, to be served on an intermittent basis, and five years of probation. The conditions of probation included that he complete the Schuyler County Drug Court program. In July 2010, following defendant's termination from the drug court program, County Court revoked defendant's probation and resentenced him to a prison term of 1 to 3 years. Defendant appeals.

We affirm. Defendant's challenges to his underlying 2009 conviction, including that he received the ineffective assistance of counsel and that the police lacked probable cause to arrest him, cannot be raised on an appeal from the judgment resentencing him following a revocation of his probation ( see People v. Daniels, 106 A.D.3d 1189, 1189, 964 N.Y.S.2d 753 [2013],lv. denied21 N.Y.3d 1014, 971 N.Y.S.2d 497, 994 N.E.2d 393 [2013];People v. Pittman, 17 A.D.3d 930, 931 n., 793 N.Y.S.2d 623 [2005],lv. denied5 N.Y.3d 767, 801 N.Y.S.2d 262, 834 N.E.2d 1272 [2005];People v. Dabbs, 178 A.D.2d 848, 849, 577 N.Y.S.2d 721 [1991],lv. denied79 N.Y.2d 946, 583 N.Y.S.2d 200, 592 N.E.2d 808 [1992] ). Further, defendant's claim that the resentence imposed was harsh and excessive is moot, inasmuch as he has completed his sentence ( see People v. Fusco, 91 A.D.3d 984, 985, 936 N.Y.S.2d 360 [2012]; People v. Mainville, 78 A.D.3d 1421, 1422, 911 N.Y.S.2d 268 [2010],lv. denied16 N.Y.3d 833, 921 N.Y.S.2d 197, 946 N.E.2d 185 [2011] ).

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. STEIN, J.P., ROSE and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

People v. Pozzi
(May 29, 2014)