AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BRENDON McPHERSON, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROGERS; MATTHEW GUNDRUM; SHAWN PLUCKROSE; JERRAD CATLIN; PAUL MORRIS; and NURSE NINA CLARK, Defendants.

DAVID N. HURD

APPEARANCES: BRENDON McPHERSON
Plaintiff pro se
HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN
Attorney General for the State of New York
Attorney for Defendants
OF COUNSEL: KRISTIN M. QUARESIMO, ESQ.
Ass't Attorney General
DAVID N. HURD
United States District Judge









DECISION and ORDER

Pro se plaintiff Brendon McPherson brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 21, 2014, the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted in part, and that all claims against defendant Nurse Nina Clark be dismissed, but that defendants' motion otherwise be denied. No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed.

Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Therefore, it is

ORDERED that

1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part;

2. All claims against defendant Nurse Nina Clark are DISMISSED; and

3. Defendants' motion is otherwise DENIED.

The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this Decision and Order upon plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________


United States District Judge
Dated: February 21, 2014


Utica, New York.


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

McPherson v. Rogers
(Feb 21, 2014)