AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the interest of B.E.D., J.N.D., J.R.D. and B.C.D., C.D. (Mother), Appellant, v. Ju

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Nodaway County, Missouri, Roger M. Prokes, Judge.
Steven E. Skinner, Maryville, MO, for appellant. David A. Baird, Maryville, MO, for respondent.
Before Division One: THOMAS H. NEWTON, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and GARY D. WITT, Judge.


ORDER


PER CURIAM:


C.D. (“Mother”) appeals the trial court's judgment terminating her parental rights. Mother contends that the court erred in that: (1) it did not make a specific finding, pursuant to section 211.447.7, that the termination of her parental rights was in the best interest of her children, and (2) the evidence would not support a finding that termination was in the best interest of the children. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum explaining our decision has been provided to the parties.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

B.C.D. v. Juvenile Officer (In re B.E.D.)
(Jan 2, 2013)