AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BIAX CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NVIDIA CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. AND SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA, INC., AND SONY ELECTRONICS INC., Defendants-Appellees.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado in No. 09-CV-1257, Judge Philip A. Brimmer.

JUDGMENT

STEVEN J. MERKER, Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, of Denver, Colorado, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

MARK S. DAVIES, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, of Washington, DC argued for defendant-appellee, Nvidia Corporation and DAVID ROKACH, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendants-appellees, Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc., et al. With them on the brief were CHRIS R. OTTENWELLER, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, of Menlo Park, California, ALEX V. CHACHKES, of New York, New York, DONALD DAYBELL and CHRISTINA VON DER AHE, of Irvine, California for defendant-appellee, Nvidia Corporation. Also on the brief was CHRISTIAN CHADD TAYLOR, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, of Palo Alto, California, for all defendants-appellees. Of counsel was INDRA NEEL CHATTERJEE, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, of Menlo Park, California, for defendant-appellee, Nvida Corporation. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

_____________


Jan Horbaly


Clerk


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Biax Corp. v. Nvidia Corp.
(Feb 8, 2013)