AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RICHARD ALLEN COHEN

Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

OPINION AND ORDER

This case is before the court on defendant Richard Allen Cohen's motion to continue. For the reasons set forth below, the court finds that jury selection and trial, now set for September 8, 2014, should be continued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7).

While the granting of a continuance is left to the sound discretion of the trial judge, United States v. Stitzer, 785 F.2d 1506, 1516 (11th Cir. 1986), the court is limited by the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161. The Act provides in part:

"In any case in which a plea of not guilty is entered, the trial of a defendant charged in an information or indictment with the commission of an offense shall commence within seventy
days from the filing date (and making public) of the information or indictment, or from the date the defendant has appeared before a judicial officer of the court in which such charge is pending, whichever date last occurs."

18 U.S.C. § 3161(c)(1). The Act excludes from the 70-day period any continuance based on "findings that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial." § 3161(h)(7)(A). In granting a continuance, the court may consider, among other factors, whether the failure to grant the continuance would "result in a miscarriage of justice," § 3161(h)(7)(B)(i), or "[w]hether the case is so unusual or so complex ... that it is unreasonable to expect adequate preparation" without granting a continuance. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii).

The court concludes that, in this case, the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the interest of the public and defendant Cohen in a speedy trial. Cohen has been indicted for knowingly selling a firearm and ammunition to felons, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 922(d)(1). He has applied for pretrial diversion and has requested additional time for the government to respond. Given these circumstances, a continuance in this matter is appropriate.

***

Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

(1) The motion to continue filed by defendant Richard Allen Cohen (doc. no. 21) is granted.

(2) The jury selection and trial for defendant Cohen, now set for September 8, 2014, is reset for November 3, 2014, at 10:00 a.m., at the Federal Courthouse in Dothan, Alabama.



DONE, this the 2nd day of September, 2014.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Cohen
(Sep 2, 2014)