Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of Toni E. LOGUE, respondent, v. Nikolas O. ABELL, appellant.

Amy Colvin, Farmingdale, N.Y. (Neal D. Futerfas of counsel), for appellant. Toni E. Logue, Baldwin, N.Y., respondent pro se.

In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Dane, J.), dated June 14, 2011, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Watson, S.M.), dated March 23, 2011, which, after a hearing, inter alia, found that he willfully violated a prior order of support and directed that a money judgment be entered in favor of the mother.

ORDERED that the order dated June 14, 2011, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court correctly denied the father's objections to the Support Magistrate's determinations. Evidence of the father's failure to pay child support as ordered constituted prima facie evidence of a willful violation ( seeFamily Ct. Act § 454[3][a]; Matter of Cooper v. Robertson, 69 A.D.3d 714, 714, 892 N.Y.S.2d 522). The burden then shifted to the father to offer competent, credible evidence of his inability to make the required payments ( see Matter of Powers v. Powers, 86 N.Y.2d 63, 69, 629 N.Y.S.2d 984, 653 N.E.2d 1154). The father, who the Support Magistrate found lacked credibility in his testimony regarding his search for employment, failed to sustain this burden. Although the father asserted that he was unemployed and had no money to pay child support, he did not present competent, credible evidence that he had actively sought employment sufficient to rebut the mother's prima facie showing ( see Matter of Cooper v. Robertson, 69 A.D.3d at 714, 892 N.Y.S.2d 522;see also Matter of Richards v. Bailey, 296 A.D.2d 412, 413, 744 N.Y.S.2d 493;Matter of Fallon v. Fallon, 286 A.D.2d 389, 389, 728 N.Y.S.2d 725).

The father's remaining contentions are without merit. ANGIOLILLO, J.P., BELEN, CHAMBERS and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Logue v. Abell
(Jul 5, 2012)