AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

WATERFORD INVESTOR SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. LOUIS BOSCO, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

ROBERT PAYNE, Senior District Judge

By Order entered herein on May 16, 2011 (Docket No. 24), PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 16) and DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 18) were referred to Magistrate Judge Dennis W. Dohnal for report and recommendation.

Having reviewed the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Docket No. 25) entered herein on July 29, 2011, DEFENDANTS' LIMITED OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Docket No. 26), PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Docket No. 27) and having considered the record and the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and finding no error therein, it is hereby ORDERED that:

(1) The defendants' limited objections are overruled;

(2) The plaintiff's objections are overruled;

(3) The REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Docket No. 25) is ADOPTED on the basis of the reasoning of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION;

(4) PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 16) is denied;

(5) DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 18) is granted; and

(6) This action is dismissed with prejudice.

The issues are adequately addressed by the briefs and oral argument would not materially aid the decisional process.

It is so ORDERED.

Richmond, Virginia

Date: August 25, 2011

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WATERFORD INVESTOR SERVICES, INC. v. BOSCO (E.D.Va. 8-26-2011)
(Aug 26, 2011)