AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Mia HENDERSON–JONES, etc., et al., Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Lowell D. Willinger, New York (Warren J. Willinger of counsel), for appellants. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Kathy H. Chang of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur Engoron, J.), entered on or about October 16, 2012, which, insofar as appealed from, granted defendants' motion to compel plaintiff Mia Henderson–Jones to submit to an independent medical examination, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

On May 30, 2012, Supreme Court so-ordered a stipulation which provided that defendants are to designate an independent medical examination within 30 days, and to conduct it within 30 days thereafter, or defendants would be deemed to have waived the examination. On June 27, 2012, defendants served a demand designating a “Dr. Michael Aronson,” but failing to designate a time for the examination. We reject plaintiffs' argument that defendants' misspelling of the doctor's name and failure to “specify the time” constitutes a waiver of the examination because it violates CPLR 3121(a) and 22 NYCRR 202.17(a). Here, “the examination was directed by court order, thus the formalities of a party serving notice of a physical or mental examination are not in issue” ( Paris v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 218 A.D.2d 561, 563, 630 N.Y.S.2d 716 [1st Dept. 1995],lv. dismissed96 N.Y.2d 937, 733 N.Y.S.2d 376, 759 N.E.2d 375 [2001] ). Ultimately, defendants were able to secure an examination on August 14, 2012, and it was not an improvident exercise of discretion for Supreme Court to have granted defendants' motion given this short delay ( see Andon v. 302–304 Mott St. Assoc., 94 N.Y.2d 740, 746, 709 N.Y.S.2d 873, 731 N.E.2d 589 [2000] ).

We have considered the parties' remaining contentions and find them unavailing. GONZALEZ, J.P., MAZZARELLI, RENWICK, RICHTER, GISCHE, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Henderson–Jones v. City of N.Y.
(Mar 5, 2013)