Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

BRUCE D. CRUISE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.

Malcolm F. Marsh

ORDER

MARSH, Judge

Magistrate Janice M. Stewart issued a Findings and Recommendation (#33) on September 28, 2012. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Commissioner's final decision should be affirmed. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). No objections have been timely filed.

When neither party objects to a Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, this court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation (#33). Accordingly, the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED and this proceeding is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________


Malcolm F. Marsh


United States District Judge


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Cruise v. Astrue
(Oct 17, 2012)