Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Richard D. HURLES, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Dora B. SCHRIRO, Respondent–Appellee.

Michael Aaron Harwin, Esquire, Law Offices of Michael A. Harwin, PC, Tucson, AZ, Denise Irene Young, Denise I. Young, Tucson, AZ, for Petitioner–Appellant. Kent Ernest Cattani, Chief Counsel, Arizona Attorney General's Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondent–Appellee.
D.C. No. 2:00–CV–00118–RCB, District of Arizona, Phoenix.
Before: PREGERSON, D.W. NELSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The Court takes the respondent's Motion for Ruling on Respondent–Appellees' Petition for Rehearing En Banc and the petitioner's Motion to remand pursuant to Martinez v. Ryan, ––– U.S. ––––, 132 S.Ct. 1309, 182 L.Ed.2d 272 (2012), under submission. The Court defers ruling on these motions pending the resolution of Detrich v. Ryan, No. 08–99001.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Hurles v. Schriro
(Mar 19, 2013)