AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Allen FLOYD, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Daniel M. Donovan, Jr., District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Morrie I. Kleinbart of counsel; Diego O. Barros on the memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), imposed February 25, 2011, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of the right to appeal was invalid ( see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 257, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145; People v. Jones, 106 A.D.3d 1106, 965 N.Y.S.2d 729; People v. Sommerville, 104 A.D.3d 880, 960 N.Y.S.2d 661; People v. McHugh, 101 A.D.3d 754, 954 N.Y.S.2d 500; People v. Badru, 98 A.D.3d 1132, 950 N.Y.S.2d 711; cf. People v. Tyrell, 22 N.Y.3d 359, 2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 08288 [2013] ) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant's contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

ENG, P.J., ANGIOLILLO, BALKIN and HALL, JJ., concur.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

People v. Floyd
(Dec 26, 2013)