Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

PROGRESSIVE MARATHON INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff/Cross–Defendant–Appellant, v. Ryan DEYOUNG and Nicole L. Deyoung, Defendants,andSpectrum Health Hospitals and Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Inter

Prior report: Mich.App., 2011 WL 2023000.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 24, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall address: (1) whether an immediate family member who knows that he or she has been forbidden to drive a vehicle, and has been named in the no-fault insurance policy applicable to the vehicle as an excluded driver, but who nevertheless operates the vehicle and sustains personal injury in an accident while doing so, comes within the so-called “family joyriding exception” to MCL 500.3113(a); and (2) if so, whether the “family joyriding exception” should be limited or overruled.

The Michigan Association for Justice, the Michigan Insurance Federation, the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc., the Michigan Health and Hospital Association, and the Commissioner of Insurance are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Progressive Marathon Ins. Co. v. Deyoung
(Sep 21, 2011)