Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

CIANBRO COMPANIES, PLAINTIFF v. MICHAEL UREMOVICH, ET AL., DEFENDANTS

D. BROCK HORNBY

ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On January 28, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, her Recommended Decision on the defendants' motion to dismiss and Order denying the defendants' motion for oral argument. The defendants filed an objection to the Recommended Decision on February 6, 2013. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED as to Counts I through IV, but GRANTED as to Count V.

The defendants shall file a full response to the motion for preliminary injunction by March 11, 2013.

SO ORDERED.

_____________


D. BROCK HORNBY


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Cianbro Cos. v. Uremovich
(Mar 4, 2013)