Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE of North Carolina v. Da

PER CURIAM.

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A–31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 208 N.C.App. 1, 702 S.E.2d 82 (2010), finding prejudicial error in a judgment entered on 4 April 2008 by Judge Thomas D. Haigwood in Superior Court, Caldwell County, and remanding for a new sentencing trial. Heard in the Supreme Court on 12 February 2013. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant. Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellee.
PER CURIAM.


For the reasons stated in State v. Ortiz–Zape, ––– N.C. ––––, ––––, 743 S.E.2d 156, 165, 2013 WL 3215911 (2013), the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

REVERSED. Chief Justice PARKER and Justice HUDSON dissent for the reasons stated in Justice HUDSON'S dissenting opinions in State v. Ortiz–Zape, –––N.C. ––––, 743 S.E.2d 156, 2013 WL 3215911 (2013) (329PA11) and State v. Brewington, ––– N.C. ––––, 743 S.E.2d 626, 2013 WL 3215751 (2013) (235PA10). Justice BEASLEY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

State v. Hurt
(Jun 27, 2013)