Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

Memphis In v. st, GP, Plaintiff

Jennifer A. Dorsey

Order Adopting Report and Recommendation [Doc. 35] and Denying Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Doc. 28]

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe's December 4, 2013, Report and Recommendation regarding Plaintiff Memphis Invest, GP's Emergency Motion for Protective Order, which requests, in the alternative, a preliminary injunction against Defendant Andrew Waite. Doc. 35; Doc. 28. Judge Koppe recommended denying the preliminary injunction because "Plaintiff has not met at least two of the requisite four preliminary injunction factors." Doc. 31 at 7. Objections were due by December 21, 2013. Neither Memphis Invest nor any defendant objected to Judge Koppe's recommendation. "[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation unless objections are filed." Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). . . . . . . . . .

Accordingly, and with good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judge Koppe's Report and Recommendation [Doc. 35] is ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Memphis Invest's Emergency Motion for Protective Order [Doc. 28] is DENIED consistent with this Order and Judge Koppe's Report and Recommendation.

_______________


Jennifer A. Dorsey


United States District Judge


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Memphis Invest, GP v. Waite
(Feb 11, 2014)