Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of Perry BELLAMY, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent.

Perry Bellamy, appellant pro se. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Sharyn Rootenberg and Larry A. Sonnenshein of counsel), for respondent.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, without costs, and certified question not answered on the ground that it is unnecessary. In denying the subject Freedom of Information Law request, the Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion.

Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH and PIGOTT concur. Judge RIVERA took no part.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Bellamy v. N.Y.C. Police Dep't
(Feb 12, 2013)