AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

RETIRED EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION OF ORANGE COUNTY, INC., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE, Defendant–Appellee.

PER CURIAM:

Michael P. Brown, Moscone, Emblidge & Quadra, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for the Plaintiff–Appellant. Arthur Anthony Hartinger, Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, Oakland, CA, for the Defendant–Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Andrew J. Guilford, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 8:07–cv–01301–AG–MLG, Central District of California, Santa Ana.Before: STEPHEN S. TROTT and WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

This court has now received an answer from the California Supreme Court to the question certified to that court. See Retired Employees Assoc. of Orange County v. County of Orange, 52 Cal.4th 1171, 134 Cal.Rptr.3d 779, 266 P.3d 287 (2011). We remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the answer provided by the California Supreme Court.

In light of the nature of the dispute in this case, and in light of the delay that has already taken place, we encourage the district court to act promptly. In the event of another appeal, this panel will retain jurisdiction and will give scheduling priority to the appeal.

So ordered.

REMANDED. -------- Notes:

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Retired Emps. Ass'n of Orange Cnty., Inc. v. Cnty. of Orange
(Dec 19, 2011)