AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

A.P. PINO & ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant.

Berle M. Schiller

ORDER

AND NOW, this 3rd day of July, 2012, upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, and the parties' responses thereto, and for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum dated July 3, 2012, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs' motion (Document No. 12) is DENIED.

2. Defendant's motion (Document No. 14) is GRANTED.

3. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiffs.

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

BY THE COURT:

________________


Berle M. Schiller
, J.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

A.P. Pino & Assocs., Inc. v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co.
(Jul 3, 2012)