Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Jose Luis Munoz SANTOS, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Linda R. THOMAS, Warden, Respondent–Appellee.

THOMAS

Gail Ivens, Esquire, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Matthew Brady Larsen, Federal Public Defender's Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner–Appellant. Jean–Claude Andre, Assistant U.S., Aron Ketchel, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, Sonja Ralston, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent–Appellee.


ORDER


THOMAS, Chief Judge:


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Santos v. Thomas
(Oct 22, 2015)