Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

HERBERT J. NAMOHALA, Plaintiff, v. SATORU STEWART MAEDA, et al., Defendants.

J. Michael Seabright

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on March 12, 2014, and no objections having been filed by any party,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the "FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY DEFENDANTS SATORU STEWART MAEDA AND MITSUYO MAEDA'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS," Doc. No. 168, are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, April 1, 2014.

__________


J. Michael Seabright


United States District Judge
Namohala v. Maeda, et al., Civ. No. 11-00786 JMS-KSC, Order Adopting Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Namohala v. Maeda
(Apr 1, 2014)