AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

LINDA C. FAIGEN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant.

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ

ORDER

Alan Stuart Graf


Alan Stuart Graf P.C.


Attorney for Plaintiff

Adrian L. Brown


U.S. Attorney's Office, District of Oregon


David J. Burdett


Social Security Administration


Attorneys for Defendant HERNANDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Jelderks issued a Findings and Recommendation (#23) on June 7, 2012, in which he recommends that this Court reverse the Commissioner's decision and remand for a finding of disability and an award of benefits. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings and Recommendation (#23). Accordingly, the Commissioner's decision is reversed, and this action is remanded for a finding of disability and an award of benefits.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________


MARCO A. HERNANDEZ


United States District Judge


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Faigen v. Astrue
(Jul 9, 2012)