Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

The PEOPLE, etc., Appellant, v. Vincent TORRES, Respondent. (Appeal No. 1) The People, etc., Appellant,

William J. Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, Syracuse (Victoria M. White of counsel), for appellant in the first and second above-entitled actions. *475J. Scott Porter, Seneca Falls, for respondent in the first and second above-entitled actions.
MEMORANDUM:


The orders of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant adequately preserved the argument that the exclusion of his wife from the courtroom violated his right to a public trial ( see People v. Alvarez, 20 N.Y.3d 75, 81, 955 N.Y.S.2d 846, 979 N.E.2d 1173 [2012];see also People v. Caban, 14 N.Y.3d 369, 373, 901 N.Y.S.2d 566, 927 N.E.2d 1050 [2010] ). The closure of the courtroom during jury selection was not trivial ( see People v. Martin, 16 N.Y.3d 607, 613, 925 N.Y.S.2d 400, 949 N.E.2d 491 [2011] ). Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH and PIGOTT concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), orders affirmed, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

People v. Torres
(Nov 20, 2012)