Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

LIONEL FRANCIS v. STEPHEN MILLER, ET AL.

BRIAN A. JACKSON, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

RULING AND ORDER

On March 13, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that Defendant Burl Cain's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10) be granted, dismissing Plaintiff Lionel Francis's ("Plaintiff) claims against him. (Doc. 15). It was further recommended that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Stephen Miller be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for failure to timely effect service.

According to the Process Receipt and Return filed into the record, the Louisiana State Penitentiary did not accept service for Msgt. Stephen Miller as he was no longer employed with the Department of Corrections. (Doc. 7). To date, Plaintiff has not filed a request to have the Department of Corrections file Stephen Miller's last known address into the record under seal, or demonstrate any further attempts to have Defendant Miller served. Accordingly, the United States Marshals Service has not made any additional attempts to serve Defendant Miller.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation specifically notified Plaintiff that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), he had fourteen (14) days from the date he received the Report and Recommendation to file written objections to the proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations therein. (Doc. 15 at p. 1). A review of the record indicates that Plaintiff has not filed any objections to date.

Having carefully considered the Plaintiff's complaint and related filings, the Court approves the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and hereby adopts its findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report (Doc. 15) is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion herein.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Burl Cain's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff SHOW CAUSE, in writing, on or before April 17 , 2015 , why his claims against Defendant Stephen Miller should not be dismissed for failure to effect timely service.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 2nd day of April, 2015.

/s/ _________


BRIAN A. JACKSON
, CHIEF JUDGE


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Francis v. Miller
(Apr 2, 2015)