Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

ROY AUSTIN SMITH, Plaintiff, v. J. BAKER, et al., Defendants.

Jane Magnus-Stinson

Entry Concerning Selected Matters
I.

The motion for summary judgment [21] is denied without prejudice because the proper manner in which to proceed is to resolve the pending motion to dismiss.

II.

The plaintiff's motion for court appointed attorney has been considered.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), courts are empowered only to "request" counsel. Mallard v. United States District Court, 490 U.S. 296, 300 (1989). There is no constitutional right to an attorney in a civil proceeding. Jackson v. Kotter, 541 F.3d 688, 700 (7th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, the question is not whether an attorney would help the plaintiffs' case, but whether, given the difficulty of the case, the plaintiffs seem competent to litigate it themselves. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 653, 655 (7th Cir. 2007) (en banc).

The court finds at present, that the claims asserted by the plaintiff are not of sufficient complexity or merit as to surpass the plaintiff's ability to properly develop and present them. Regardless, the plaintiff is within the spectrum of "most indigent parties" because he has and will have a meaningful opportunity to present his claim, he has demonstrated familiarity with his claims and the ability to present them, because the issues presented by the claims are not complex, and because this does not appear to be a case in which the presence of counsel would make a difference in the outcome. See Farmer v. Haas, 990 F.2d 319, 322 (7th Cir. 1993); DiAngelo v. Illinois Department of Public Aid, 891 F.2d 1260, 1262 (7th Cir. 1989) ("[m]ost indigent parties in civil cases must fend for themselves here, attempting to persuade lawyers to take their cases and representing themselves if members of the bar think their claims weak").

Based on the foregoing, the plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel [24] is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________


Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge


United States District Court


Southern District of Indiana
Distribution: Electronically Registered Counsel Roy Austin Smith
6274
Wabash Valley Correctional Facility
6908 S. Old US Hwy 41
P.O. Box 1111
Carlisle, IN 47838








Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Smith v. Baker
(Nov 1, 2012)