AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

JAMES PARK, Mo v. nt,

DONALD M. MIDDLEBROOKS

(07-20588-CR-MTODLEBROOKS)
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Movant's pro se Motion to Vacate Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ("§ 2255 Motion") (CV-DE 1), attacking his conviction and sentence in Case No. 07-20588-CR-MIDDLEBROOKS.

Movant appears to assert five arguments: (1) the prosecution engaged in misconduct by altering a transcript of a recording and counsel was ineffective for failing to move for dismissal; (2) he was denied effective assistance of counsel, where his lawyer failed to timely file a motion for new trial based upon newly discovered evidence; (3) he was denied effective assistance of counsel where counsel conceded his participation in the conspiracy and that one or two kilograms of cocaine should be attributed to the movant; (4) the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion for judgment of acquittal based on prosecutorial misconduct and lack of notice of 404(b) evidence; and (5) the trial court abused its discretion by allowing the jury to only review count II of the indictment during deliberations.

This matter was referred to the Honorable United States Magistrate Judge Patrick A. White, who issued a Report and Recommendation (CV-DE 22) ("Report") recommending that Movant's Motion to Vacate be denied for the several reasons set forth in his detailed and thorough Report. Judge White filed his Report on September 10, 2012, and, since that time, neither Party has filed an objection. I have considered Judge White's Report, Movant's § 2255 Motion, the Government's Response to the Motion (CV-DE 13), and Movant's Reply (CV-DE 16), and am otherwise fully advised in the premises.

Having conducted an independent de novo review of the record in this case, I find that Judge White correctly determined that Movant's Motion to Vacate should be dismissed. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Report, and upon a careful, de novo review of the record, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that United States Magistrate Judge White's Report and Recommendation (CV-DE 22) is RATD7DZD, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED in its entirety.

It is further

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Movant's Motion to Vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (CV-DE 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in West Palm Beach, Florida, this 3 day of Dec. 2012.

______________


DONALD M. MIDDLEBROOKS


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
cc:
Magistrate Judge White;
Counsel of Record;
James Park, pro se






Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Park v. United States
(Dec 3, 2012)